I met a financial advisor for a coffee a few weeks ago. He wanted to pick my brains about ethical investing. He said he wanted to be ‘more green’ and wanted my advice on building ethical portfolios for clients. He seemed to think ethical investing was merely about avoiding tobacco and arms; it’s moved on a lot, I said, as I rolled my eyes, questioning whether he was willing to be truly committed and informed about the world of ethical investing.
I came across this great piece of investment research by Calvert Research and Management called ‘The Rise of ESG Investing’ which talks about the latest trends and client drivers. It also talks about financial advisors and their attitudes towards ESG. The study is US based. However, I think it translates well to the UK market too. I marked out some interesting bits and listed them below with my comments.
Born between 1980 and 2000, Millenials command wealth, a social conscience and power. By 2020, it is estimated they will make up 46% of the workforce. This is a generation with sway and swag, who hold social responsibility, social justice, equality and environment causes as top priorities.
Research quoted in the report states that 53% of millennials make investment decisions based on social responsibility factors, compared to 42% of Gen Xers, 41% of baby boomers and 39% of seniors. I don’t see too many millennials but it is encouraging to see the younger generations voicing themselves so clearly.
Advisers should incorporate basic ESG questions and filters into their initial discussions of goals and objectives with current and prospective clients and take a proactive approach to identifying needs and interests.
I strongly agree. I don’t push ESG investments as a ‘right’ or ‘preferred’ way of investing; it is not for everyone, and yet, the client has a right to make an informed decision – ESG or not. I imagine advisors enjoy offering a broader menu of options to clients and those who have worked hard to acquire expertise & conviction in ESG investing reap the benefits in attracting investors interested in responsible investing.
For many advisers, portfolio performance is a non-issue when it comes to ESG considerations. It ranks near the bottom of the reasons advisers utilize it; for non-users, ESG’s limiting of investment options ranks near the top of considerations. Just 29% of advisers believe there is a positive correlation between corporate financial performance and ESG factors. While manager selection for ESG strategies may be limited compared to the broader universe of funds and managers, the menu is increasing in size. Overall, investment research broadly suggests that the performance of socially conscious funds has a “positive tilt relative to the overall universe of funds”. While returns may not be a real hurdle, there is an increasing breadth of options – and potential strategies – that advisers can utilize.
There are around 113 funds that meet the ESG/Ethical criteria as regulated funds for clients in the UK so yes, the universe is smaller. Also, the menu of available investment options excludes passive funds (there are a few, but they don’t meet enough criteria to be included in any meaningful way) which means clients may pay a bit more for an ethical portfolio. However, every day, I see a greater abundance of options including with company pensions, such as the L&G Future World fund focused on climate change, which is encouraging.
Adviser usage of ESG factors
The strongest indicator of adviser utilization of ESG factors was the level of client interest in social and environmental issues and, secondarily, the adviser’s own knowledge of responsible investing as well as their performance of the importance of evaluating ESG factors for client portfolios.
I have met clients who are keen to invest ethically but then are put off by an adviser’s own biases; I believe this is more to do with the advisers own level of felt competence in the area than the facts of whether ESG is an inferior strategy as an investment option or not. 56% of advisors cite client demand as the main reason to utilize ESG. Among advisors who don’t use ESG investments, 58% said their clients are not interested in ESG factors, 29% said it leads to limited investment opportunities and 22% said it leads to poor or limited returns; I hear that last one most often too when I talk about it informally with advisor colleagues.
ESG factors brought up most often in client meetings
Among all ESG factors, the “E” – environmental – draws the most client interest. In our survey, 39% of advisers said that clean technology was one of the most commonly prioritised ESG criteria in client meetings, followed by climate change (35%) and emissions and waste (26%).
An ethical investment questionnaire now has so many factors to it including pornography, human rights violations, genetic modifications, product stewardship and animal welfare. Like I said, it’s moved on from just avoiding tobacco and arms companies. The survey also lists under social and governance issues the factors most frequently mentioned were human rights (22%) and corporate transparency (16%).
Knowledge stands in the way
Just 38% of responding advisers in our survey answered “Yes” to our question, “Do you feel knowledgeable when it comes to ESG investing?” Aside from client demand, advisers cite moral/ethical reasons as the secondary driver for their use of ESG.
38% is quite a large number. So, for clients who are looking to invest ethically or with ESG in mind, going to a knowledgeable advisor on ESG makes sense.